Devs added a lot of mana spending gimmicks to it, but it just ended putting the emphasis on how shallower that franchise is compared to other Paradox games.Īnd, it’s a shame because the Early Modern/Colonial era is much interesting to me than any other historical era.Įventually Europa Universalis V will be announced, and this sub will get flooded with new users, creating a community out of nowhere. I get it, it started as a board game, but I can’t help but feel that EU has lost its appeal when it stuck to a simpler gameplay design. I go back to playing EU4, yet it feels like all I can do is paint the map in my colour. I play HoI for the warfare tactics, and resources management aspects and I can paint the map if I want to. I will soon play Victoria 3 for the socio-economic simulation gameplay, and I can paint the map in my colour if I want to. I play CK3 for the engaging RP elements and I can paint the map if I want to. Loved it, and bought all the Grand strategy games they have made ever since.īut I have to say EU has not aged well compared to the other Paradox franchises.
I started playing Paradox’s Grand strategy games when I bought EU1 20 years ago.
0 kommentar(er)
